Bluesky is weighing a proposal that gives users consent over how their data is used for AI
Latest
AI
Amazon
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Newsletters
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Speaking at the SXSW conference in Austin on Monday, Bluesky CEO Jay Graber says the social network has been working on a framework for user consent over how they want their data to be used for generative AI.
The public nature of Bluesky’s social network has already allowed others to train their AI systems on users’ content, as was discovered last year when 404 Media came across a dataset built from 1 million Bluesky posts hosted on Hugging Face.
As a result, Bluesky’s open source, decentralized X alternative has grown to over 32 million users in just two years’ time.
However, the demand for AI training data means the new social network has to think about its AI policy, even though it doesn’t plan to train its own AI systems on users’ posts.
Speaking at SXSW, Graber explained that the company has engaged with partners to develop a framework for user consent over how they would want their data to be used — or not used — for generative AI.
“We really believe in user choice,” Graber said, saying that users would be able to specify how they want their Bluesky content to be used.
“It could be something similar to how websites specify whether they want to be scraped by search engines or not,” she continued.
“Search engines can still scrape websites, whether or not you have this, because websites are open on the public Internet. But in general, this robots.txt file gets respected by a lot of search engines,” she said. “So you need something to be widely adopted and to have users and companies and regulators to go with this framework. But I think it’s something that could work here.”
The proposal, which is currently on GitHub, would involve getting user consent at the account level or even at the post level, then ask other companies to respect that setting.
“We’ve been working on it with other people in the space concerned about how AI is affecting how we view our data,” Graber added. “I think it’s a positive direction to take.”
Topics
Consumer News Editor
Sarah has worked as a reporter for TechCrunch since August 2011. She joined the company after having previously spent over three years at ReadWriteWeb. Prior to her work as a reporter, Sarah worked in I.T. across a number of industries, including banking, retail and software.
At SXSW, Bluesky CEO Jay Graber pokes fun at Mark Zuckerberg with Latin phrase T-shirt
ServiceNow to buy Moveworks for $2.85B to grow its AI portfolio
Rocket Companies to acquire Redfin for $1.75B
Neom is reportedly turning into a financial disaster, except for McKinsey & Co.
Manus probably isn’t China’s second ‘DeepSeek moment’
Colossal CEO Ben Lamm says humanity has a ‘moral obligation’ to pursue de-extinction tech
How to stop doomscrolling
Subscribe for the industry’s biggest tech news
Every weekday and Sunday, you can get the best of TechCrunch’s coverage.
TechCrunch's AI experts cover the latest news in the fast-moving field.
Every Monday, gets you up to speed on the latest advances in aerospace.
Startups are the core of TechCrunch, so get our best coverage delivered weekly.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice.
© 2025 Yahoo.
EMEA Tribune is not responsible for this news, news agencies have provided us this news.
Follow us on our WhatsApp channel here .
